re: dsl
Sunday, September 30, 2007 at 5:32 pm
Windows 2000 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by DEX
(11846 messages posted)
Dealing with Unwanted Spyware and Parasites
Click Here
Hi CK
Well I don't know about anyone else but I have a BOX on rear of the house where the
phone line drops in from the pole and at that point they installed the box for the
DSL line, it all comes in on one line (drop) I have Qwest for my DSL , my 2 sons
have the same thing on the rear of the house.
Then I have the DSL box in the house as well that is hooked up to the phone line
and then to the router and 6 computers...4 are on the cat.5 hard wire and two are
wireless.
Fix It Yourself Click Here
On Sunday, September 30, 2007 at 2:05 pm, C K wrote:
>Actually your information is slightly incorrect. Many providing companies don't
>put a splitter in the line (which would be the best), rather, thay have self install
>kits they send out. Depends on the service and the country you live in of course.
> You have to check with the provider to see what they require as an install. You
>need filters on every device except the DSL modem if you don't have a splitter installed.
> Every DSL to date will need the voice range devices to be low pass filtered (blocks
>the high frequencies that you don't want in your voice range devices) and stops
interference
>from voice devices to the DSL service, without a splitter installed on the incoming
>line.
>
>The faster the DSL the higher the frequency to a point and the harder it may be
to
>hear over the old normal handset (non-electronic/solidsate phones), but the devices
>using the voice range (phones, 56k modems, fax machines) will need filters on them
>or they will not work correctly, or at all IME. That is unless your provider has
>installed a splitter at your location but that requires a dedicated line be installed
>to your DSL modem...
>
>IE, I have Verizon and Centurytel, and both have digital hash on the phones without
>the filters installed (they normally don't install splitters as both use self install
>kits). While the newer DSL service isn't as digitally "noisey" as was my old slower
>service was, it is still significant without filters installed and stops the service
>when someone picks up a handset.. Any install FAQ for DSL will verify my info..
>
>
>
>
>
- Written in response to:
- re: dsl (C K: Sunday, September 30, 2007 at 2:05 pm)
Responses to this message:
 | re: dsl (C K: Sunday, September 30, 2007 at 5:46 pm) |
|
|
All messages in this thread [show all]
 | dsl (phantom: Sun, Sep 30, 2007, 8:42 am) |
 |  | re: dsl (C K: Sun, Sep 30, 2007, 10:37 am) |
|  | | re: dsl (phantom: Mon, Oct 1, 2007, 4:17 am) |
| | re: dsl (DEX: Sun, Sep 30, 2007, 11:37 am) |
| | | re: dsl (C K: Sun, Sep 30, 2007, 2:05 pm) |
| | | | re: dsl (DEX: Sun, Sep 30, 2007, 5:32 pm) |
| | | | | re: dsl (C K: Sun, Sep 30, 2007, 5:46 pm) |
| | | | | | re: dsl (DEX: Sun, Sep 30, 2007, 7:15 pm) |
| | | | | | | re: dsl (C K: Mon, Oct 1, 2007, 12:06 am) |
| | | re: dsl (phantom: Mon, Oct 1, 2007, 4:24 am) |
| | re: dsl (Steve: Mon, Oct 1, 2007, 3:13 pm) |
| | | re: dsl (phantom: Tue, Oct 2, 2007, 4:44 am) |
| |
| |
Return to the Windows 2000 Discussion Forum
|
|
