Annoyances.org
Home » Windows 98 Discussion Forum » Message 1253206955 Search | Help | Home
  
Tip: Run a free scan for common Windows errors ad

Another alternative? (was:...XP...)
Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 10:02 am
Windows 98 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by gewg_ (3943 messages posted)


Arminius wrote:
|[...]have you considered installing Windows 2000?
|
|On the plus side:
|2) Runs better on older hardware than WinXP.
|
This assumes that he looked at the XP Hardware Compatibility List
and already confirmed that all his devices *are* supported under XP.
I have my doubts on that--re: "supported" and re: "looked".
The fact is, the device in question *may not* work under Win2000.

|3) There is NO product activation.
|
That's the big one.  It's MS's last product without that nonsense.

|On the down side:
|1) Microsoft will stop issuing patches for it next year.
|
Heh.  Wishful thinking.

|Overall, I'd say Windows 2000 has a few good years left in it.
|
I wouldn't say that at all.  Here are the facts:
When a security hole was revealed in Win9x weeks before M$'s stated EoS date,
M$ simply dropped support for Win9x early
when they knew they would actually have to expend some effort to close the hole.

In a similar move which has been widely reported due to its callousness,
M$ has ALREADY decided to stop patching Win2000
(most of a year before its stated EoS). 
from the Usenet Archive -- Terry Porter

|2) A growing number of third party software vendors are dropping support for it.
|
Yup.  When you look at the list of things that no longer run under W2k
(or NEVER DID), is only slightly better than 9x--and both lists grow weekly.

|3) Second hand CDs are not cheap.
|
Despite my playful chiding of the OP earlier in this thread (that Commie),
I do not advocate giving money for software.
I have already mentioned Gratis and Libre (Free Software).
Anyone with a BitTorrent client can also get any of this unsupported M$ stuff
without financially supporting a fundamentally corrupt business environment.
(Paying for abandonware seems immoral to me--not to mention dumb.)




Written in response to:
re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Arminius: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 at 5:16 pm)

Responses to this message:
*re: Another alternative? (was:...XP...) (Arminius: Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 9:22 pm)
*re: Another alternative? (was:...XP...) (Arminius: Saturday, September 26, 2009 at 8:53 pm)

All messages in this thread [show all]
-Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Alan: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 1:56 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Steve: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 2:50 pm)
*re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Alan: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 3:13 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Steve: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 3:06 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Alan: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 3:18 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Steve: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 3:30 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Alan: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 3:41 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Steve: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 3:56 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Alan: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 4:28 pm)
*re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (gewg_: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 5:16 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Alan: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 5:00 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Steve: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 6:33 pm)
*re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Alan: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 7:12 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (gewg_: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 5:14 pm)
*re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Alan: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 5:20 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (gewg_: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 3:36 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Alan: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 3:55 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Arminius: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 5:16 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Arminius: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 5:19 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (gewg_: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 5:25 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Arminius: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 6:20 pm)
*re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (gewg_: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 6:41 pm)
-Another alternative? (was:...XP...) (gewg_: Thu, Sep 17, 2009, 10:02 am)
-re: Another alternative? (was:...XP...) (Arminius: Thu, Sep 17, 2009, 9:22 pm)
*re: Another alternative? (was:...XP...) (gewg_: Thu, Sep 17, 2009, 10:40 pm)
-re: Another alternative? (was:...XP...) (Arminius: Sat, Sep 26, 2009, 8:53 pm)
-re: Another alternative? (was:...XP...) (gewg_: Sun, Sep 27, 2009, 2:05 pm)
-re: Another alternative? (was:...XP...) (Arminius: Sun, Sep 27, 2009, 5:00 pm)
*re: Another alternative? (was:...XP...) (gewg_: Sun, Sep 27, 2009, 11:38 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Alan: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 5:03 pm)
-An OS that doesn't require activation (was:...XP...) (gewg_: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 6:46 pm)
*re: An OS that doesn't require activation (was:...XP...) (Alan: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 7:27 pm)
Return to the Windows 98 Discussion Forum


All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright © 1995-2009 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.