Recent Messages (page 2 of 6262)

How much do you trust your (operating) system? (gewg_: Thu, Nov 5, 2009, 5:46 pm)

re: How much do you trust your (operating) system? (MartinM: Mon, Nov 9, 2009, 11:21 pm)

re: How much do you trust your (operating) system? (gewg_: Tue, Nov 10, 2009, 9:51 am)

The results are in (was: How much do you trust your (operating) system?) (gewg_: Wed, Nov 18, 2009, 9:29 am)

Yet another reason to never click links in email (gewg_: Fri, Oct 30, 2009, 3:09 pm)

re: Yet another reason to never click links in email (dhm: Fri, Oct 30, 2009, 4:50 pm)

windows visa (william redmond: Sun, Oct 25, 2009, 12:02 pm)

re: w{W}indows v{V}is{T}a (Kiwi: Sun, Oct 25, 2009, 12:38 pm)

re: w{W}indows v{V}is{T}a (gewg_: Sun, Oct 25, 2009, 5:55 pm)

re: w{W}indows v{V}is{T}a (Kiwi: Mon, Oct 26, 2009, 3:46 am)

re: w{W}indows v{V}is{T}a (gewg_: Mon, Oct 26, 2009, 9:53 am)

re: w{W}indows v{V}is{T}a (Arminius: Wed, Oct 28, 2009, 3:42 pm)

re: w{W}indows v{V}is{T}a (gewg_: Wed, Oct 28, 2009, 4:32 pm)

re: w{W}indows v{V}is{T}a (Kiwi: Wed, Oct 28, 2009, 5:01 pm)

re: windows visa (gewg_: Sun, Oct 25, 2009, 1:00 pm)

re: windows visa (gewg_: Tue, Oct 27, 2009, 10:11 am)

re: windows visa (Keith Stanier: Mon, Oct 26, 2009, 5:14 am)

re: windows visa (gewg_: Mon, Oct 26, 2009, 9:08 am)

re: windows visa (dhm: Fri, Oct 30, 2009, 5:44 pm)

re: windows visa (Kiwi: Sat, Oct 31, 2009, 11:26 am)

re: windows visa (dhm: Mon, Nov 2, 2009, 11:11 am)

re: windows visa or master charge (Kiwi: Mon, Nov 2, 2009, 5:53 pm)

re: windows visa (Steve: Wed, Oct 28, 2009, 10:24 am)

re: windows visa (gewg_: Wed, Oct 28, 2009, 12:10 pm)

re: windows visa (Steve: Wed, Oct 28, 2009, 12:44 pm)

re: windows visa (Arminius: Wed, Oct 28, 2009, 3:33 pm)

The competition for the desktop (gewg_: Thu, Oct 29, 2009, 1:22 pm)

re: windows visa (J.R.: Mon, Nov 2, 2009, 8:10 pm)

Performed illegal error (rundll: Fri, Oct 23, 2009, 11:48 pm)

re: Performed illegal [operation] (gewg_: Sat, Oct 24, 2009, 9:36 am)

Computer Associates, Internet Security Suite 2007 (Robert J. Rhame: Wed, Oct 21, 2009, 4:03 am)

re: Computer Associates, Internet Security Suite 2007 (gewg_: Wed, Oct 21, 2009, 8:11 am)

re: Computer Associates, Internet Security Suite 2007 (Steve: Wed, Oct 21, 2009, 11:48 am)

re: Computer Associates, Internet Security Suite 2007 (gewg_: Wed, Oct 21, 2009, 12:13 pm)

re: Computer Associates, Internet Security Suite 2007 (Steve: Wed, Oct 21, 2009, 12:29 pm)

re: Computer Associates, Internet Security Suite 2007 (Robert J. Rhame: Thu, Oct 22, 2009, 5:36 am)

boot failure (jack hall: Thu, Oct 15, 2009, 8:51 am)

re: Parity error (was: boot failure) (gewg_: Thu, Oct 15, 2009, 10:39 am)

re: Parity error (was: boot failure) (jack hall: Thu, Oct 15, 2009, 11:21 am)

re: Parity error (was: boot failure) (Arminius: Thu, Oct 15, 2009, 8:31 pm)

re: Parity error (was: boot failure) (Kiwi: Thu, Oct 15, 2009, 9:58 pm)

re: Parity error (was: boot failure) (jack hall: Sat, Oct 17, 2009, 3:50 pm)

re: Parity error (was: boot failure) (Arminius: Sat, Oct 17, 2009, 7:22 pm)

re: Parity error (was: boot failure) (jack hall: Sat, Oct 17, 2009, 4:07 pm)

re: Parity error (was: boot failure) (gewg_: Sat, Oct 17, 2009, 6:27 pm)

Redmond (finally) scraps Microsoft Works (gewg_: Sun, Oct 11, 2009, 10:07 am)

re: Redmond (finally) scraps Microsoft Works (Steve: Tue, Oct 13, 2009, 8:35 am)

re: Redmond (finally) scraps Microsoft Works (gewg_: Tue, Oct 13, 2009, 11:34 am)

re: Redmond (finally) scraps Microsoft Works (Steve: Tue, Oct 13, 2009, 11:46 am)

re: Redmond (finally) scraps Microsoft Works (gewg_: Tue, Oct 13, 2009, 1:02 pm)

re: Redmond (finally) scraps Microsoft Works (dhm: Fri, Oct 30, 2009, 5:29 pm)

Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (gewg_: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 2:54 pm)

re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (Steve: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 6:42 pm)

re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (gewg_: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 10:20 pm)

re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (Steve: Thu, Oct 8, 2009, 6:58 am)

re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (gewg_: Thu, Oct 8, 2009, 11:15 am)

re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (Steve: Thu, Oct 8, 2009, 11:47 am)

re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (gewg_: Thu, Oct 8, 2009, 1:57 pm)

re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (sekirt: Sat, Oct 17, 2009, 5:37 am)

re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (gewg_: Sat, Oct 17, 2009, 2:05 pm)

re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (sekirt: Sun, Oct 18, 2009, 11:20 pm)

re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (gewg_: Mon, Oct 19, 2009, 12:02 pm)

The single biggest problem on the 'Net (was:...EULAs) (gewg_: Tue, Oct 27, 2009, 7:28 pm)

INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (gewg_: Wed, Nov 11, 2009, 2:03 pm)

re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (sekirt: Wed, Nov 11, 2009, 2:37 pm)

re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (gewg_: Wed, Nov 11, 2009, 6:24 pm)

re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (sekirt: Wed, Nov 11, 2009, 7:46 pm)

re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (gewg_: Wed, Nov 11, 2009, 10:53 pm)

re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (sekirt: Wed, Nov 11, 2009, 11:20 pm)

Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (Kiwi: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 4:10 am)

re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (Arminius: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 7:43 am)

re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (Kiwi: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 8:28 pm)

re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (gewg_: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 11:05 am)

re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (Kiwi: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 8:34 pm)

re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (gewg_: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 9:16 pm)

re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (Kiwi: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 10:32 pm)

re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (gewg_: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 11:24 pm)

re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Kiwi: Thu, Oct 8, 2009, 10:21 am)

re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Arminius: Thu, Oct 8, 2009, 3:41 pm)

re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (gewg_: Thu, Oct 8, 2009, 6:13 pm)

re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Arminius: Thu, Oct 8, 2009, 9:18 pm)

re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (gewg_: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 12:04 am)

re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Arminius: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 2:34 am)

re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (gewg_: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 1:47 pm)

re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Kiwi: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 2:15 pm)

re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Arminius: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 9:05 pm)

re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Kiwi: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 2:07 pm)

re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Kiwi: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 3:24 pm)

re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (gewg_: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 6:07 pm)

re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Kiwi: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 1:51 pm)

re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Kiwi: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 1:25 pm)

re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (gewg_: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 6:14 pm)

re: Maybe a fresh new thread, instead? (Kiwi: Sun, Oct 18, 2009, 8:33 pm)

re: Maybe a fresh new thread, instead? (gewg_: Mon, Oct 19, 2009, 11:48 am)

re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Arminius: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 8:49 pm)

re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Kiwi: Sat, Oct 10, 2009, 7:21 am)

re: Another "Lightweight", it's K-Meleon. (Kiwi: Sun, Oct 11, 2009, 2:50 pm)

re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (gewg_: Sat, Oct 10, 2009, 2:16 pm)

re: The first Lightweight something is running now (Kiwi: Sat, Oct 10, 2009, 6:56 pm)

re: The first Lightweight something is running now (gewg_: Sat, Oct 10, 2009, 9:25 pm)

re: Do all of these things still require the intermediate CD construction? (Kiwi: Sun, Oct 18, 2009, 6:56 pm)

re: Do all of these things still require the intermediate CD construction? (gewg_: Sun, Oct 18, 2009, 9:44 pm)

re: Do all of these things still require the intermediate CD construction? (Kiwi: Mon, Oct 19, 2009, 4:10 am)

re: Do all of these things still require the intermediate CD construction? (gewg_: Mon, Oct 19, 2009, 11:55 am)

re: So far, I haven't seen the Xubuntu GUI illustrated (Kiwi: Mon, Oct 19, 2009, 1:10 pm)

re: So far, I haven't seen the Xubuntu GUI illustrated (gewg_: Mon, Oct 19, 2009, 3:38 pm)

re: The fluxbox GUI in DSL doesn't look too bad at all (Kiwi: Tue, Oct 20, 2009, 4:06 pm)

Broadband that almost isn't (Kiwi: Wed, Oct 21, 2009, 5:35 pm)

re: Broadband that almost isn't (gewg_: Wed, Oct 21, 2009, 7:24 pm)

re: So far, I haven't seen the Xubuntu GUI illustrated (gewg_: Tue, Oct 20, 2009, 11:11 am)

Bee Linux (Kiwi: Wed, Oct 21, 2009, 1:54 am)

re: Bee Linux (gewg_: Wed, Oct 21, 2009, 8:03 am)

re: Do all of these things still require the intermediate CD construction? (gewg_: Tue, Nov 10, 2009, 11:25 pm)

re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (J.R.: Mon, Nov 2, 2009, 8:16 pm)

re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (gewg_: Mon, Nov 2, 2009, 8:52 pm)

Found: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (Kiwi: Tue, Nov 3, 2009, 12:59 am)

re: Found: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (gewg_: Tue, Nov 3, 2009, 12:34 pm)

re: Found: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (Kiwi: Tue, Nov 3, 2009, 12:58 pm)

Exception OE has occured at 0028..DAD1099B in VXD_ _ _ (eric: Mon, Oct 5, 2009, 8:33 am)

re: Exception [0E] has occured at 0028..DAD1099B in VXD_ _ _ (gewg_: Mon, Oct 5, 2009, 10:17 am)

• Post a new message
• Sign in / set forum preferences

• Search this forum