Annoyances.org
Home » Windows Me Discussion Forum » Message 1244579770 Search | Help | Home
  
Tip: Run a free scan for common Windows errors ad

Using a Hard Disk exceeding 137GB with SATA
Tuesday, June 9, 2009 at 1:36 pm
Windows Me Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by Ed (659 messages posted)


In fact I've fitted my Windows ME machine with a set of USB 2.0 ports, by installing a PCI card. So I would not be trying this with a USB 1.1 port.

What I was wondering is whether anyone had met with unqualified success, perhaps by installing a USB 2.0 PCI card with a 48-bit LBA controller? My existing PCI card is an old one, which I would have to replace. It does the job well, in terms of providing USB 2.0 ports; but it doesn't have a 48-bit controller.

Does your Adaptec USB 2 PCI card provide 48-bit LBA support?

The only PCI cards I've so far found which provide 48-bit LBA functions are for SATA or PATA/EIDE disks, but I was hoping to track down a USB 2.0 PCI card that has a 48-bit LBA controller.

Otherwise my best option might be a 48-bit SATA PCI card. There are lots about, e.g. at Amazon. But that means fitting a 3.5 inch caddy in my spare 5.25 inch drive bay, installing a SATA hard disk (OEM) into it, buying a SATA data cable and a molex-to-SATA power cable convertor, and installing a SATA PCI card. A slightly daunting prospect!

Can you think of any problems to watch out for in installing and partitioning a SATA disk (probably a 500 GB disk) in that way?

(Other than the need for the partitions to be less than 127GB each for WinME. The disk would have to be partitioned using the hard disk manufacturer's software.)

Ed





On Thursday, May 28, 2009 at 10:55 pm, C K wrote:
>I looked through the drivers on that site at one time, but didn't find any that fit
>my hardware so didn't try any.
>
>I use all Acomdata or Vantec enclosures (prefer Acomdata though) so it really doesn't
>matter about the model number. The older ones I use on the Win 9X system are no
>longer sold, but the newer models that are still around should work the same, but
>the newer models may cause problems on a USB1.1 system no matter what drivers you
>use. I have an Adaptec USB 2 and Firewire card on my Asus P2B-DS system that has
>been really stable. The cheaper cards really gave me fits, including scrambling
>the data on the drives when they decided to disconnect so it was worth the extra
>20 bucks for the adaptec as the BX chipset in the motherboard seemed to like it better.
>
>I haven't had corruption yet, but then I don't run the Win 9X system every day either
>so it could be only a matter of time...


Written in response to:
re: Using a Hard Disk exceeding 137GB with USB (C K: Thursday, May 28, 2009 at 10:55 pm)

Responses to this message:
*re: Using a Hard Disk exceeding 137GB with SATA (Ricer46: Sunday, August 9, 2009 at 7:28 am)

All messages in this thread [show all]
-Using a Hard Disk exceeding 137GB with USB (Ed: Fri, May 22, 2009, 4:23 am)
*re: Using a Hard Disk exceeding 137GB with USB (Steve: Fri, May 22, 2009, 6:16 am)
-re: Using a Hard Disk exceeding 137GB with USB (C K: Fri, May 22, 2009, 3:40 pm)
-re: Using a Hard Disk exceeding 137GB with USB (Ed: Sat, May 23, 2009, 9:25 am)
-re: Using a Hard Disk exceeding 137GB with USB (C K: Thu, May 28, 2009, 10:55 pm)
-Using a Hard Disk exceeding 137GB with SATA (Ed: Tue, Jun 9, 2009, 1:36 pm)
-re: Using a Hard Disk exceeding 137GB with SATA (Ricer46: Sun, Aug 9, 2009, 7:28 am)
*re: Using a Hard Disk exceeding 137GB with SATA (Ed: Sat, Aug 22, 2009, 9:08 pm)
Return to the Windows Me Discussion Forum


All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright © 1995-2009 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.