re: which is better/necessary
Wednesday, September 17, 2008 at 6:20 pm
Windows XP Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by Ricer46
(20219 messages posted)
Definitely 2 x 256
On Wednesday, September 17, 2008 at 3:28 pm, Anthony J. Thannisch wrote:
>Hello and thanks to all. I have a question and I know that the vast experience herein
>can help me with an answer. I looked at the Search options and could not find what
>it is that I need. I recently replaced a bad RAM card with a much smaller one and
>not the PC is WAAAAy slow. The other RAM card had lots of errors and I removed one
>from another PC I had and placed it into my present Compaq Presario tower. No errors
>as shown on MemTest after a 12000+% run. The tower has 2-128 MB cards and only one
>was bad. Now, I get no BSODs at all. My question is, since my motherboard will take
>up to 512MB RAM (I use XP, 256MB RAM, IE7 Sp3), would it be better to replace both
>128MB cards with one 512MB or another 128MB? Is it necessary to have cards in both
>slots? If so, then I will stick to another 128MB. This is new ground for me and
I
>am not sure about what to do.
>Thank you again for your time and help.
>Tony
- Written in response to:
- which is better/necessary (Anthony J. Thannisch: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 at 3:28 pm)
There are presently no replies to this message.
|
|
All messages in this thread [show all]
 |  | re: which is better/necessary (Ricer46: Wed, Sep 17, 2008, 6:20 pm) |
| |
| |
Return to the Windows XP Discussion Forum
|
|
